Editing abuse filter

Filter parameters

Filter ID:	8
Description: (publicly viewable)
Conditions:	!"autoconfirmed" in user_groups & new_size < 50 & old_size > 500 & (article_namespace == 0) & !user_name in article_recent_contributors & !(lcase(added_lines) rlike "#redirect\|{{((db-(attack\|g10))\|wi)}}") !"autoconfirmed" in user_groups & new_size < 50 & old_size > 500 & (article_namespace == 0) & !user_name in article_recent_contributors & !(lcase(added_lines) rlike "#redirect\|{{((db-(attack\|g10))\|wi)}}")
Notes:	Should there be a note in the warning about what to do if you're a BLP subject attempting to blank your own article? Also, yay, first comment! - east These notes are not private, by the way. The false positives page has not been created yet, so the warning page is incomplete. I deactivated the action 'warn'. Re-enabled after creating it -- Andrew We really need a better way to talk. Do tildes work here? ~~~ (east) Guess not :'( Ignore if editor is the only editor of the page (faked by checking last 10 editors) Redefine blanking as any size under 50, where the page started at >500 (min delta of 450) Logic fixes, some of the conditions were redundant - Hersfold Note that filter applies only to new users. (eg non autoconfirmed but new user is shorter) Optimizing - Hersfold Add redirect avoidance, necessary if this is going to allow pages to not be fully blank. - DF changed "user_name in article_recent_contributors" to "!(user_name in article_recent_contributors)" - Hersfold Adding & !(user_name == 69.226.103.13) to temporarily exempt that IP address from this filter, see my talk page for details. - Hersfold Scratch that, removing per Prodego's comments on filter 30. If it got removed there, I shouldn't be adding it here. - Hersfold I added an exception for {{db-attack}} template. - Ruslik I added an exception for {{db-g10}} template. - Od Mishehu Optimization of the code. - Ruslik Moved new size check before namespace check - rationale very few edits result in size < 50, most are to namespace 0. Moved old size before namespace check - rationale _given_ new size< 50 very few edits will have oldsize > 500 (especially by new users), however most will be to mainspace. Previous to change average run time 6.52ms, 27 conditions. RF OK condition stats seem meaningless varying from 8 to 500 I'll review in 10,000 edits time. Run 5.97 conditions 14, but I don't trust them. RF. Now monitoring namespace 100 (portal) Shirik 12 Feb 2010 Optimize --Tim Adding Wiktionary template to prevent false positives. -v^_^v Optimize using regex. - KoH Portals are simply not worth the runtime. - KoH Temporarily adding the reference desks due to a persistent IP-hopping vandal. Will disable when it's over.--JD Was ultimately not needed. Removed.--JD Ugh, is that vandal watching this filter? --JD The vandal seems to have again stopped blanking. If (s)he resumes, re-add the condition. --JD Vandal is back. Will leave on longer. --JD Removing now. Sorry for the comment/log spam here. --JD
Flags:	Hide details of this filter from public view Enable this filter Mark as deleted
Filter last modified:	15:32, 4 February 2022 by Galaxian (talk \| contribs)
History:	View this filter's history
Tools:	Export this filter to another wiki {"row":{"af_id":"8","af_pattern":"!\"autoconfirmed\" in user_groups\r\n\u0026 new_size \u003C 50\r\n\u0026 old_size \u003E 500\r\n\u0026 (article_namespace == 0)\r\n\u0026 !user_name in article_recent_contributors\r\n\u0026 !(lcase(added_lines) rlike \"#redirect\|{{((db-(attack\|g10))\|wi)}}\")","af_user":"1","af_user_text":"Galaxian","af_timestamp":"20220204153249","af_enabled":"0","af_comments":"Should there be a note in the warning about what to do if you're a BLP subject attempting to blank your own article?\r\n\r\nAlso, yay, first comment! - east\r\n\r\nThese notes are not private, by the way.\r\n\r\nThe false positives page has not been created yet, so the warning page is incomplete. I deactivated the action 'warn'.\r\n\r\nRe-enabled after creating it -- Andrew\r\n\r\nWe really need a better way to talk. Do tildes work here? ~~~ (east)\r\nGuess not :'(\r\n\r\nIgnore if editor is the only editor of the page (faked by checking last 10 editors)\r\n\r\nRedefine blanking as any size under 50, where the page started at \u003E500 (min delta of 450)\r\n\r\nLogic fixes, some of the conditions were redundant - Hersfold\r\n\r\nNote that filter applies only to new users. (eg non autoconfirmed but new user is shorter)\r\n\r\nOptimizing - Hersfold\r\n\r\nAdd redirect avoidance, necessary if this is going to allow pages to not be fully blank. - DF\r\n\r\nchanged \"user_name in article_recent_contributors\" to \"!(user_name in article_recent_contributors)\" - Hersfold\r\n\r\nAdding \u0026 !(user_name == 69.226.103.13) to temporarily exempt that IP address from this filter, see my talk page for details. - Hersfold\r\nScratch that, removing per Prodego's comments on filter 30. If it got removed there, I shouldn't be adding it here. - Hersfold\r\nI added an exception for {{db-attack}} template. - Ruslik\r\nI added an exception for {{db-g10}} template. - Od Mishehu\r\nOptimization of the code. - Ruslik\r\nMoved new size check before namespace check - rationale very few edits result in size \u003C 50, most are to namespace 0. Moved old size before namespace check - rationale _given_ new size\u003C 50 very few edits will have oldsize \u003E 500 (especially by new users), however most will be to mainspace. Previous to change average run time 6.52ms, 27 conditions. RF\r\nOK condition stats seem meaningless varying from 8 to 500 I'll review in 10,000 edits time.\r\nRun 5.97 conditions 14, but I don't trust them. RF.\r\n\r\nNow monitoring namespace 100 (portal) Shirik 12 Feb 2010\r\n\r\nOptimize --Tim\r\n\r\nAdding Wiktionary template to prevent false positives. -v^_^v\r\n\r\nOptimize using regex. - KoH\r\nPortals are simply not worth the runtime. - KoH\r\n\r\nTemporarily adding the reference desks due to a persistent IP-hopping vandal. Will disable when it's over.--JD\r\n\r\nWas ultimately not needed. Removed.--JD\r\n\r\nUgh, is that vandal watching this filter? --JD\r\n\r\nThe vandal seems to have again stopped blanking. If (s)he resumes, re-add the condition. --JD\r\n\r\nVandal is back. Will leave on longer. --JD\r\n\r\nRemoving now. Sorry for the comment/log spam here. --JD","af_public_comments":"New user blanking articles","af_hidden":"0","af_hit_count":"0","af_throttled":"0","af_deleted":"0","af_actions":"warn,disallow,tag","af_global":"0","af_group":"default"},"actions":{"disallow":["abusefilter-disallowed"],"tag":["Blanking"],"warn":["abusefilter-warning-blanking"]}}

Actions to take when matched

Trigger actions only if the user trips a rate limit

Number of actions to allow:

Period of time (in seconds):

Group throttle by:

user

See the documentation on mediawiki.org.

Trigger these actions after giving the user a warning

System message to use for warning:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Prevent the user from performing the action in question

System message to use for disallowing:

Page name of other message:

(without "MediaWiki:" prefix)

Revoke the user's autoconfirmed status

Block the user and/or IP address from editing

Block the user and/or IP address from editing their own talk page

Block duration for anonymous users:

Block duration for registered users:

Tag the edit for further review

Tags to apply:

Blanking

PROFESSION

GAME MODE

PvE GUIDES

PvP GUIDES

WvW GUIDES

Editing abuse filter