Difference between revisions of "Chronomancer - Utility Boon Support (Fractal)"

(Rename?)
(Rename?)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
It doesn't make sense for a build with so many possible variations to have such a specific (not to mention confusing) name. Shouldn't it be changed to something like "Chronomancer - Utility DPS"? -[[User:Somohexual|Somohexual]] ([[User talk:Somohexual|talk]]) 19:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 
It doesn't make sense for a build with so many possible variations to have such a specific (not to mention confusing) name. Shouldn't it be changed to something like "Chronomancer - Utility DPS"? -[[User:Somohexual|Somohexual]] ([[User talk:Somohexual|talk]]) 19:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 
: It was named after the "Mesmer - S/S /F /P" build. But I guess you certainly have a point. I also like your suggestion. [[User:Neijala|Neijala]] ([[User talk:Neijala|talk]]) 12:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 
: It was named after the "Mesmer - S/S /F /P" build. But I guess you certainly have a point. I also like your suggestion. [[User:Neijala|Neijala]] ([[User talk:Neijala|talk]]) 12:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 +
:: Valid point. ''Utility DPS'' sound good, or maybe we could just make it be S/x DPS? --[[Image:Necromancer class icon.png|20px|link=User:Hanz]][[User:Hanz|Hanz]]([[User talk:Hanz|talk]]) 12:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:24, 10 December 2015

General

The current situation of PVE Chrono builds here is a mess! Tough there are a few good approaches none is very comprehensive or detailed. They all lack some valid options and promote some questionable default trait or weapon choices.

Because the original Mesmer - S/S /F /P build is very good and detailed I used it as a foundation for a new comprehensive Chrono guide which contains and improves the other builds previously posted here. With the current state of the Chronomancer there are a lot valid choices depending on encounter so I posted a lot of variations with short explanations when to use them.

Neijala (talk) 13:13, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Gj but could someone tone down the Overview a bit? It should be only 1 or max 2 sentences not a novel :P --Necromancer Icon Color.pngHanz(talk) 15:24, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Called it x) Fredor (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm becoming predictable D: --Necromancer Icon Color.pngHanz(talk) 19:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
or i just havr spent way too much time here Fredor (talk) 22:00, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Some people enjoy reading :P Shortened it nonetheless Neijala (talk) 22:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Rename?

It doesn't make sense for a build with so many possible variations to have such a specific (not to mention confusing) name. Shouldn't it be changed to something like "Chronomancer - Utility DPS"? -Somohexual (talk) 19:48, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

It was named after the "Mesmer - S/S /F /P" build. But I guess you certainly have a point. I also like your suggestion. Neijala (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Valid point. Utility DPS sound good, or maybe we could just make it be S/x DPS? --Necromancer Icon Color.pngHanz(talk) 12:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)